🔗 Share this article

The beluga known as Jelly Bean’s offspring Bertie is an adorable little “sweetheart”. The whale Orion – nicknamed “Onion” – is a big but fiercely protective friend. Another whale, Zephyr has “constant motion” and wiggles like a worm. Lillooet is the “biggest cuddle bug” with a heart of gold.

A group of thirty enclosed marine mammals in a Canadian entertainment facility have been caught in a struggle between a closed attraction, government authorities and welfare campaigners.

But those most familiar with the whales say the impassioned discussion over their future often fails to consider the nuances of the whales who, after spending their lives in confinement, have been carefully observed by the people who interact with them daily.

After the national authorities blocked the export of the belugas to a foreign facility, the controversial attraction near Niagara Falls where they are kept stated it would consider to end their lives unless the federal government funds the upkeep of their survival. The nation’s marine resources official has rejected that ultimatum, placing the thirty whales in an dangerously unstable situation.

Highly Cognitive Sea Creatures

Researchers say that belugas’ neuroanatomy, along with their sound replication, cognitive challenges and group interactions point to they are remarkably smart creatures – something a former trainer learned personally.

Burgess spent several years as a whale caretaker, a position that entailed earning the trust of the sea creatures.

“Building up those bonds over time takes a lot of dedication and a lot of care. At the beginning, they’re very unsure of you,” she said. “In time, you gain mutual trust. And they start being more open with you. It’s just so extraordinary and gratifying.”

The trainer knew the whales were very smart, but she says she was even so surprised by the nuances and quirks in their personalities. She formed a special affection for Eve and Cleopatra with contrasting natures.

“One whale selected me. Cleo made me earn it,” she said. “Both transformed the way I perceive connection.”

Public Concerns and Facility Decline

Burgess’s interaction with the whales evolved against a backdrop of increasing societal concern to their confinement.

During her three years at the facility, multiple belugas and the park’s one orca, the orca, succumbed. In all, 19 belugas have perished at the park since 2019, a number which the facility attributes to expected lifespan, but which activists say reflects the substandard environment in which they were kept.

The facility did not operate to the visitors over the summer, but Burgess says she observed directly results of the shutdown. “Concrete is breaking off from the pools because they’re in disrepair and not being fixed. The whales are inquisitive and so they take pieces and swim around with fragments in their jaws. It’s distressing to see.”

The park did not respond to a inquiry, but earlier asserted: “The whales … obtain far superior veterinary services and 24/7 attention than any individual in the Britain, or elsewhere.”

Fate in Limbo and Proposed Solutions

The former employee was terminated from the park in recent months following the passing of a beluga, an sick beluga the park staff had to euthanize. She said the park believed information of the incident were shared to the media and she was fired shortly thereafter.

The uncertainty over the whales’ outcome has left her and staff members in anguish. She says the facility’s threat to kill its whales is a negotiation tactic and is a “extremely difficult” endeavor, adding any plans to euthanize even a single beluga would require “significant staff”, vehicles and heavy equipment.

“There’s no way in hell the staff would ever do it,” she said.

She advocates for requests for the whales to be taken right away from the facility, with its failing enclosures and dwindling staff.

In recent months, Canada’s government official turned down a bid to transfer the whales to an overseas location.

“To approve the request would have meant a perpetual life in enclosure and a reversion to display for amusement,” the minister stated. “As Canadians, we know that marine mammals are meant for the ocean, not in pools for our amusement. I could not in good conscience authorize an transfer that would continue the situation these belugas have experienced.”

But the former trainer said the minister’s remarks reflect a more general misunderstanding of the facts of existence for belugas born in captivity.

“The society needs to understand these are whales that have existed solely in enclosed habitats and they will need ongoing assistance for the rest of their years,” she said. “The public just don’t realize that it’s not as straightforward as saying ‘shut it down’.”

Sanctuary Proposal and Ongoing Debate

As authorities attempt to find a answer, suggestions have emerged, some of which have minimal feasibility. One proposal called for the belugas to be let go into the natural habitat of northern regions – where whales are a primary resource of sustenance for Indigenous peoples.

A proposed refuge in the province of eastern Canada, which now received official endorsement, has shown to be most controversial. The planned site, which includes 100 acres of penned in ocean, is not yet built. Proponents remain optimistic that it could eventually represent a permanent resolution for a number of the whales.

But, Burgess says, among trainers she’s spoken with, there is “no trust there” about what she said is “merely an experiment” in the whales’ fate.

Some experts say the possibility of a protected habitat represents a worldwide trend away from animal displays and could represent a viable approach in the near future.

Charles Vinick, leader of the plan, said the location will replicate the mental engagement and diet the whales receive from caretakers, albeit in a more expansive environment. He said after the medical condition of whales is fully assessed, which could take months|an extended period|