🔗 Share this article

Loved ones of people buried in resting places vulnerable to shoreline retreat argue that a lack of decision on how best to address the problem is causing them avoidable anguish concerning the final resting places of their departed family.

A Looming Threat to Ancient Graveyards

Local authorities have identified three burial grounds in the villages of Happisburgh, Mundesley, and Trimingham as being at risk of being consumed by the ocean in the next few generations.

A recent report on the issue sets out a range of options, from doing nothing to disinterring bodies and reburying them in more secure sites. Authorities maintain it is for the community to determine how to proceed.

“Right now we’re in limbo. It upsets me. They intended this to serve as their final resting place, but it isn’t going to be because of the sea.”

Projections indicate at least part of one churchyard could be claimed by the waves in the next 80 years, but some residents fear it will happen far earlier. “I think it’s got under 20 years, if you look at what’s occurred in the last 30 years,” a farmer stated.

Troubled by the Ghosts of Eccles

One resident remembered a school trip to the nearby settlement of Eccles, which has almost entirely vanished into the water, including its place of worship and burial ground.

“It was possible to see people’s bones,” she said. “Some have this idealized notion that the deceased will just get carried away to sea. They won’t. Individuals will collect remains as souvenirs and go grave robbing looking for treasures. It’s completely undignified.”

“I fear that the identical fate that befell at Eccles will happen at Happisburgh and there’ll be skeletons on the beach. I would feel disgusted by that.”

A Soldier's Resting Place in Jeopardy

Along the shoreline is situated the grave of a ex-soldier who died while serving overseas. His mother said she could not sleep after discovering her son’s grave might one day be relocated.

“It truly disturb me to consider this won’t be his permanent home,” she said. “For us it’s an important site to visit.”

In her view, new interments should cease but says it is premature to exhume current plots. “What I would choose for now is to take no action and closely monitor, but an timely resolution must be made when a tipping point has been reached.”

Seeking Solutions and Certainty

The lack of agreement over the timing and method to handle the problem has resulted in grieving relatives feeling exasperated and worried.

Several families are calling for additional coastal protections to slow the unavoidable loss and to permit burials to proceed for now. Different voices argue the moment for moving graves is approaching.

“The situation is very emotional,” a family member stated. “The official study was really good, but now there’s uncertainty about how it is implemented. And all parties is avoiding responsibility over who is responsible.”

A coastal manager said the burial sites were under the care of the church authorities. “Ultimately it is up to them to decide the direction to take. We are here to help support them through that journey with residents.”

He added there was time to consider all the choices. “We are talking many years before it begins getting lost.”

“Currently, there exists no common view on what should happen yet. We need productive local conversations to find the appropriate solutions for each community.”

The possibility of the loss of the historic sites was described as one of “profound sadness for the local community,” but church representatives also referenced a belief in resurrection, providing a spiritual viewpoint on the temporal disappearance of sacred ground.